I applied for Social Security benefits in December and recieved a call from the SS office today. The woman told me I was approved for benefits.
I found this kind of weird. Doesn't SSI send you a letter telling you this? Thank you.
Answer:
My step daughter receives SSI and they called us to let us know she was approved and then a few days later we received a letter in the mail stating the amount she would get each month.
If you indeed have been approved for benefits, you will get an award letter in the mail informing you of any back amount and your current monthly amount. If you do not receive the information within two weeks, you should make an appointment to see your case worker.
You probably will get a follow-up letter. Yes, they do normally send a letter. A copy of it goes into your file, for verification purposes. It really doesn't make a big difference, anyway, because you still don't get the benefits until they get around to starting them. But they should also tell you what date they list for your "start of disability." Then the first benefit check should be a lump sum, retroactive to that date. So either way, you still have to "hurry up and wait."
Tuesday, May 25, 2010
A processor tried to serve me at my parents home. when told I don't live there, the processor said if he didn
a processor tried to serve me at my parents home. when told I don't live there, the processor said if he didn't take the paper or tell him where I lived my parents could be subpena to tell them where I live.
Answer:
The process server is correct.
They can't tell anyone where you live if they do not...HINT HINT
I don't think that's legal. The process server has to track you down himself. They can only subpena someone if it is to testify in court. Tell your parents that they don't have to tell processors anything other than you don't live there and shut the door!
What kind of dead beat are you????
Jack is correct.
You parents can be ordered to appear in court and if they refuse to tell where you live the courts can fine them, jail them and find them in contempt of court.
I mean its up to you, sounds like you need to own up for your own actions abd be an adult.
Answer:
The process server is correct.
They can't tell anyone where you live if they do not...HINT HINT
I don't think that's legal. The process server has to track you down himself. They can only subpena someone if it is to testify in court. Tell your parents that they don't have to tell processors anything other than you don't live there and shut the door!
What kind of dead beat are you????
Jack is correct.
You parents can be ordered to appear in court and if they refuse to tell where you live the courts can fine them, jail them and find them in contempt of court.
I mean its up to you, sounds like you need to own up for your own actions abd be an adult.
A print vendor printed my project without written consent / approval. What are my legal options?
A print vendor was selected to print my project. I approved the proof (with signature) and requested verbally to attend the press check. However, the printer completely printed the job without notifying me of the press check. To make matters worse, there were design errors on the project. The vendor is wanting full payment, but I stated I would not pay due to not providing a signed agreement to go to press without my presence. Who's right? What are my legal options?
Answer:
if you remembered to patent the piece then you have recourse. refer to and/or retain a lawyer.
You don't say who made the design errors. You don't say whether your approval before the print run was an express part of the job or whether it is generally done in your business. In my experience approval of a proof is generally is a "go" signal to the printer. Suggest you talk to a lawyer to whom you can show %26 explain all the facts.
Depends on what the contract states. You may want to get a lawyer.
Answer:
if you remembered to patent the piece then you have recourse. refer to and/or retain a lawyer.
You don't say who made the design errors. You don't say whether your approval before the print run was an express part of the job or whether it is generally done in your business. In my experience approval of a proof is generally is a "go" signal to the printer. Suggest you talk to a lawyer to whom you can show %26 explain all the facts.
Depends on what the contract states. You may want to get a lawyer.
A policeman gave me a ride home last night because my ride didn't show, why'd he write down my license after?
I was sitting outside the bar on a bench and two cops drove up because someone reported an intoxicated person outside. I was just sitting there but I was very drunk. I was just going to walk home but it was preety far. Could he have arrested me if I wasn't being a disturbance, I was just quietly sitting there? One was kind enough to give me a ride but he did take my license and wrote down the info. on it. He knew me because I worked at a gas station he frequented while on duty. Why'd he write down my info.? Should I worry about this? Or is this normal protocal? I'm glad he didn't arrest me becuase it is so wrong if someone isn't making a disturbance and is of legal age and WAS NOT DRIVING.
Answer:
Many patrolman have to keep a log. He, more than likely, just took your information down to enter into his patrol log. The log would read that he responded to the call and found you sitting on the bench and gave you a courtesy ride to your residence. Some places may do an informational report saying pretty much the same thing. If you was going to arrest you, he would have done it at the bench outside the bar.
Cops like to document everything they do. Sometimes its to cover their bum and sometimes its to gather evidence against you. If he had to write a report regarding the call and what he did it would be dumb to say he gave a ride to a stranger and not be able to say who. Unless I'm driving or need ID to buy alcohol, I try not to carry ID. Why should I?
I believe some areas have public intoxication laws, but most likely he was documenting the who, what,and why of what he was doing during that time period for the record.
its against all department regulations too give any civillans a free ride in a ny police car. they could be immediately fired. the reason is insurance reasons. if they were too get in a accident with you in there being drunk or what ever, they could be imediately firedd. and you could have suied the police dept/ these officers were, out of line. unless they arrest you. they need to go ba ck too the police academy fast.
Whether your are being quiet and orderly or not...the offense you COULD have been arrested for is called Public Intoxication.
Too often people don't see your side of how police frequently assist those in distress. You COULD have been arrested but instead were given a safe ride home.
Taking your license information is for nothing more than insuring the "courtesy ride" was documented as a part of the shift activity log!
Best wishes.
Could still have been a drunk and disorderly charge. Maybe he wants to date you?
they needed your info to file an incident report for the record... that is all.
It is normal to write down every person we come in contact with. All sorts of crimes have been solved this way. If you committed a crime and someone came up and said you frequented a certain place it could help. If you were found with no ID it could help that he had your name on file. After you left the car he may have ran a warrant check. He may have taken your name down because it is his department policy to write down every person he transports. Or, he may have been worried you would say something inappropriate happened and wanted to ensure that he had your name just in-case a complaint was made... You could have also been cited for public intox, you admitted to being drunk. I assume that you weren't because you said this officer comes to your gas station...We like our free coffee.
In my opinion it's just procedure. I witnessed a car accident one time and they took my driver's license information... I'm certain it's along the same lines. Just keeping track of who they came into contact with and what they were doing on the government's time.
Answer:
Many patrolman have to keep a log. He, more than likely, just took your information down to enter into his patrol log. The log would read that he responded to the call and found you sitting on the bench and gave you a courtesy ride to your residence. Some places may do an informational report saying pretty much the same thing. If you was going to arrest you, he would have done it at the bench outside the bar.
Cops like to document everything they do. Sometimes its to cover their bum and sometimes its to gather evidence against you. If he had to write a report regarding the call and what he did it would be dumb to say he gave a ride to a stranger and not be able to say who. Unless I'm driving or need ID to buy alcohol, I try not to carry ID. Why should I?
I believe some areas have public intoxication laws, but most likely he was documenting the who, what,and why of what he was doing during that time period for the record.
its against all department regulations too give any civillans a free ride in a ny police car. they could be immediately fired. the reason is insurance reasons. if they were too get in a accident with you in there being drunk or what ever, they could be imediately firedd. and you could have suied the police dept/ these officers were, out of line. unless they arrest you. they need to go ba ck too the police academy fast.
Whether your are being quiet and orderly or not...the offense you COULD have been arrested for is called Public Intoxication.
Too often people don't see your side of how police frequently assist those in distress. You COULD have been arrested but instead were given a safe ride home.
Taking your license information is for nothing more than insuring the "courtesy ride" was documented as a part of the shift activity log!
Best wishes.
Could still have been a drunk and disorderly charge. Maybe he wants to date you?
they needed your info to file an incident report for the record... that is all.
It is normal to write down every person we come in contact with. All sorts of crimes have been solved this way. If you committed a crime and someone came up and said you frequented a certain place it could help. If you were found with no ID it could help that he had your name on file. After you left the car he may have ran a warrant check. He may have taken your name down because it is his department policy to write down every person he transports. Or, he may have been worried you would say something inappropriate happened and wanted to ensure that he had your name just in-case a complaint was made... You could have also been cited for public intox, you admitted to being drunk. I assume that you weren't because you said this officer comes to your gas station...We like our free coffee.
In my opinion it's just procedure. I witnessed a car accident one time and they took my driver's license information... I'm certain it's along the same lines. Just keeping track of who they came into contact with and what they were doing on the government's time.
A planet policed by the US, anyone?
The US has plans to control space with their STARWARS program or NMD and if it becomes a reality, the US would be the total dictator of the planet we all call home. It would mean total control of all sea, land, air, space and cybersp ace, which in reality means total and absolute control over the planet and of course the ability to strike at other countries without fear of retaliation. WORLD DOMINANCE was on the agenda the moment they withdrew unilaterally from the Anti-Ballistic Missile Treaty which has banned the so called Starwars program.Does it means that the planet as a whole agrees to be under the dictate of the US and how so?
Answer:
Sadly, you are correct. The USA spends more on warfare and policing than the rest of the world put together. The USA does police the planet, and unfortunately it does so corruptly and with bias. The USA controls the world's resources through the dollar. The USA controls the world's communications through space.
This is the same country that during the 1970's dropped more bombs on the poorest country in the world - Laos - than were dropped during the entire 2nd World War, so that should make us all feel pretty secure.
Why do we let them get away with it? The few countries in the world who object - Cuba - Iran - Libya - Venezuela - North Korea - France - etc etc don't have anything better to offer.
A touch of realism is needed here..Do not believe all the marxist left wing anti American trash you read/hear
Naaah, the U.S tried that with Vietnam, Iraq, etc. They just loose too many toes shooting themselves in the foot. What else would they blow off with a starwars system? :)
what is this, the 1980s? - sounds like you are the type of person who needs a bomb shelter.
You are taking quite a leap of faith there buddy. Slow down, step back, take a deep breath, and look at it from a wider perspective. Even if the plan was to dominate space the fact remains that at this point it is still that - a plan. I plan to be the richest man in the world, does that mean I can buy my own submarine, jet, and the Philadelphia Eagles next week? No.
Even the greatest technology ever created does not guarantee absolute control. That is a foolish assumption that has no purpose before the fact.
And most importantly, how can the "plan" be so close to reality since the ABMT banned the SDI?
I can think of many greater things that this world needs to be concerned with. Terrorism, over-population, indifference, apathy, arrogance, global warming, over-industrialization, greed. Our time spent on these subjects can be more fruitful if we work at it.
policed by the US?
GOD FORBID!!!!! i shall move to Mars
They may try, but it will not happen, when you try to control too much, you become the common enemy and will be quickly dealt with, some people think the USA is unbeatable, but you just have to look at Iraq, and Afghanistan, to see we can be beat by nearly ancient methods.
no it does not mean the planet agrees it is time the un became effective it is the policeman of the world not the u.s. also if they do this it is time to stop calling kim iljong a dictator and saying a country not as large as the u.s. which largely keeps the u.s. from invading through nuclear weapons is being mistreated by kim lljongand and admit the u.s. is the dictator, also there is a claim kim iljong starves his countrymen to fund his army who has the largest army in the world who is the most powerfull and constantly reminds people of it the u.s. that's who
No f***k**g way
It probably IS time for the UN to become the "policeman of the world" (if indeed we are ever going to have such an entity). Trouble is that the US is refusing to pay the dues for membership of the UN, and at last count, they owed several billion dollars in "back pay"...... It's OK to say "I'm the boss", but if you have no money to be the boss with, you end up being a bit of a toothless tiger.
It would be nice if eneryone could get on together, but I doubt that will ever happen, still, I live in hope
I can hardly wait to get this puppy operational!Treaties are like promises meant to be broken. I defy you to find one country that respected any treaty other than the USA. Time to grow up kid...Learn the term NATIONAL SECURITY/NATIONAL INTERESTS.
so misinformed. the real control is economic We're talking China.
I'm American. It's true that the U.N. does not want us to have it. We'll have the potential to dictate the entire world. President Bush unfortunately dodges what the U.N. says. He disobeys the U.N. only so it could suit him and his warmongering republicans.
someone is going to be the "Superpower", now, would u rather have communist and athiest China telling you what to do and controlling the world, or the USA...
you need medication, only someone deeply disturbed would invent far out wackey things like this to worry about. Grow up, worry about something you have some control over rather than ragging on the US. Get a stuffed animal, it wont argue with you as you start to go off the deep end.
You've been watching too many movies.
If what has written by HG wells is going to happen,it has already happened.Now with the collapse of USSR,the world govt headed by US has become reality.It is a fact there is no power at present to challenge US.If you talk about China it is only a regional power,but not a financial power.Since might is right,star wars and ABM has become redundant.The world dominance by US is inevitable and there is no alternative.Sorrry to disappoint.(I am not from USA)
Wow, is this the best you have to worry about? Say the US does take over the world? So what? Who would you rather take it over? Someone like Sadam? Hitler? Mussolini? The US has more checks and balances that any other nation. They aren't always right, but a damn site better than most.
Answer:
Sadly, you are correct. The USA spends more on warfare and policing than the rest of the world put together. The USA does police the planet, and unfortunately it does so corruptly and with bias. The USA controls the world's resources through the dollar. The USA controls the world's communications through space.
This is the same country that during the 1970's dropped more bombs on the poorest country in the world - Laos - than were dropped during the entire 2nd World War, so that should make us all feel pretty secure.
Why do we let them get away with it? The few countries in the world who object - Cuba - Iran - Libya - Venezuela - North Korea - France - etc etc don't have anything better to offer.
A touch of realism is needed here..Do not believe all the marxist left wing anti American trash you read/hear
Naaah, the U.S tried that with Vietnam, Iraq, etc. They just loose too many toes shooting themselves in the foot. What else would they blow off with a starwars system? :)
what is this, the 1980s? - sounds like you are the type of person who needs a bomb shelter.
You are taking quite a leap of faith there buddy. Slow down, step back, take a deep breath, and look at it from a wider perspective. Even if the plan was to dominate space the fact remains that at this point it is still that - a plan. I plan to be the richest man in the world, does that mean I can buy my own submarine, jet, and the Philadelphia Eagles next week? No.
Even the greatest technology ever created does not guarantee absolute control. That is a foolish assumption that has no purpose before the fact.
And most importantly, how can the "plan" be so close to reality since the ABMT banned the SDI?
I can think of many greater things that this world needs to be concerned with. Terrorism, over-population, indifference, apathy, arrogance, global warming, over-industrialization, greed. Our time spent on these subjects can be more fruitful if we work at it.
policed by the US?
GOD FORBID!!!!! i shall move to Mars
They may try, but it will not happen, when you try to control too much, you become the common enemy and will be quickly dealt with, some people think the USA is unbeatable, but you just have to look at Iraq, and Afghanistan, to see we can be beat by nearly ancient methods.
no it does not mean the planet agrees it is time the un became effective it is the policeman of the world not the u.s. also if they do this it is time to stop calling kim iljong a dictator and saying a country not as large as the u.s. which largely keeps the u.s. from invading through nuclear weapons is being mistreated by kim lljongand and admit the u.s. is the dictator, also there is a claim kim iljong starves his countrymen to fund his army who has the largest army in the world who is the most powerfull and constantly reminds people of it the u.s. that's who
No f***k**g way
It probably IS time for the UN to become the "policeman of the world" (if indeed we are ever going to have such an entity). Trouble is that the US is refusing to pay the dues for membership of the UN, and at last count, they owed several billion dollars in "back pay"...... It's OK to say "I'm the boss", but if you have no money to be the boss with, you end up being a bit of a toothless tiger.
It would be nice if eneryone could get on together, but I doubt that will ever happen, still, I live in hope
I can hardly wait to get this puppy operational!Treaties are like promises meant to be broken. I defy you to find one country that respected any treaty other than the USA. Time to grow up kid...Learn the term NATIONAL SECURITY/NATIONAL INTERESTS.
so misinformed. the real control is economic We're talking China.
I'm American. It's true that the U.N. does not want us to have it. We'll have the potential to dictate the entire world. President Bush unfortunately dodges what the U.N. says. He disobeys the U.N. only so it could suit him and his warmongering republicans.
someone is going to be the "Superpower", now, would u rather have communist and athiest China telling you what to do and controlling the world, or the USA...
you need medication, only someone deeply disturbed would invent far out wackey things like this to worry about. Grow up, worry about something you have some control over rather than ragging on the US. Get a stuffed animal, it wont argue with you as you start to go off the deep end.
You've been watching too many movies.
If what has written by HG wells is going to happen,it has already happened.Now with the collapse of USSR,the world govt headed by US has become reality.It is a fact there is no power at present to challenge US.If you talk about China it is only a regional power,but not a financial power.Since might is right,star wars and ABM has become redundant.The world dominance by US is inevitable and there is no alternative.Sorrry to disappoint.(I am not from USA)
Wow, is this the best you have to worry about? Say the US does take over the world? So what? Who would you rather take it over? Someone like Sadam? Hitler? Mussolini? The US has more checks and balances that any other nation. They aren't always right, but a damn site better than most.
A pharmaceutical company wanted to sue another for violateing a patitent what court would they be in?
Answer:
Federal District Court
Civil court.
civil
Patient Court....
Federal District Court in the state the person being sued lives in.
A person with a Green Card takes away more of my constitutional rights?
I tell you if it comes down to it I will be more then happy to defend my right to bear arms, if it takes blood to defend my rights so be it.
Answer:
Well we certainly do have that right, what we dont have is an education system that theroughly explains that to everyone.
as for the imagration issue well thats what it is supposed to be, Come to the United States and make a new life and a new home.
But what is going on is, Come to the United states take a job and then take the money, then go back and spend it in the country you came from.
The whole problem is that peole are not imagrating, they are taking the money and running, they dont want to saty here, to live here to make the U.s%26gt; there home, thye just want the money and run.
That money should go back into our economy spent on American owned business's, it should not be going to South America to pay off some drug cartel!
A person with a Green Card has the same rights as a US Citizens under the US Constitution except the right to vote, to serve on a jury, and the right to hold elected office.
RIGHT ON !!!!!!! 100% AGREE WITH YOU
Someone with a "green card," (It doesn't necessarily come green anymore), has the same rights as any American citizen except the right to vote. They are LEGAL ALIENS, not ILLEGAL ALIENS. Before they got the card, they had to go through a lengthy process of verification; medical, educational, psychological, professional background. Americans are speaking in ignorance when they fuss about aliens who do not choose to become citizens in the US. As long as the person is here legally, under a permanent visa (green card), the person can work, go to school, join the military, pay taxes, function like any American. There is no real advantage to taking an oath and becoming an American citizen. Furthermore, I think it's sad that some people are so ready to start fighting because of the act of an unstable man. Americans commit murders and other crimes in other countries too, and I'm not referring to military people. I'm speaking about ordinary American citizens who live abroad. You do know that there are a lot of Americans who have left the US and prefer to live in other countries? So relax. It's not one-sided. Criminal minded people are everywhere.
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX...
Bush is: Remember that legal aliens pay taxes when they work in the US. Don't be so biased. You should speak to people in foreign countries who have to deal with large American companies that make a fortune in their lands and take out all of the money and still leave them poor. There are two sides to every story.
Answer:
Well we certainly do have that right, what we dont have is an education system that theroughly explains that to everyone.
as for the imagration issue well thats what it is supposed to be, Come to the United States and make a new life and a new home.
But what is going on is, Come to the United states take a job and then take the money, then go back and spend it in the country you came from.
The whole problem is that peole are not imagrating, they are taking the money and running, they dont want to saty here, to live here to make the U.s%26gt; there home, thye just want the money and run.
That money should go back into our economy spent on American owned business's, it should not be going to South America to pay off some drug cartel!
A person with a Green Card has the same rights as a US Citizens under the US Constitution except the right to vote, to serve on a jury, and the right to hold elected office.
RIGHT ON !!!!!!! 100% AGREE WITH YOU
Someone with a "green card," (It doesn't necessarily come green anymore), has the same rights as any American citizen except the right to vote. They are LEGAL ALIENS, not ILLEGAL ALIENS. Before they got the card, they had to go through a lengthy process of verification; medical, educational, psychological, professional background. Americans are speaking in ignorance when they fuss about aliens who do not choose to become citizens in the US. As long as the person is here legally, under a permanent visa (green card), the person can work, go to school, join the military, pay taxes, function like any American. There is no real advantage to taking an oath and becoming an American citizen. Furthermore, I think it's sad that some people are so ready to start fighting because of the act of an unstable man. Americans commit murders and other crimes in other countries too, and I'm not referring to military people. I'm speaking about ordinary American citizens who live abroad. You do know that there are a lot of Americans who have left the US and prefer to live in other countries? So relax. It's not one-sided. Criminal minded people are everywhere.
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX...
Bush is: Remember that legal aliens pay taxes when they work in the US. Don't be so biased. You should speak to people in foreign countries who have to deal with large American companies that make a fortune in their lands and take out all of the money and still leave them poor. There are two sides to every story.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)